Monday, September 04, 2006
Microsoft OneCare: googletoolbarinstaller.exe is a virus
More on Microsoft's core subscription software service later ...
Sunday, September 03, 2006
iPhoto: what remains when you delete every image?
I dissected the remainders until I got the empty Library to 5.8MB. Here's what remained:
Thumb*.data: 125MB - when you delete images iPhoto does not necessarily clean up the thumb caches. These can be safely deleted.I'm going to take the 45 images I recovered and compare them to the images in my main Library. I'll provide as an update to this post.
iPod Photo Cache: 580MB - this is what goes on my iPod. It wasn't removed when I deleted all the iPhoto images.
2004: 75MB (41 photos)
and
2005: 2.3MB (1 photo)
I think these are left over folders from when I moved from iPhoto 5 to iPhoto 6. They probably hold images that remained after everything else was relocated. Interestingly iPhoto never produced any error messages about these residual images. I think they were all images I deleted that somehow didn't get removed properly.
Originals: 2 photos only remained in my Originals folder, apparent duplicates two of the images in the 2004 folder.
The final residual: 5.8MB
Friday, September 01, 2006
When OS X Disk Utility Fails: Error code -9972
From Apple’s KB:
Disk Utility reports \Underlying... In rare circumstances, Disk Utility may display the following message when you try to repair a disk:
"The underlying task reported failure"
The Disk Utility log will also display a -9972 error code. This indicates that your disk volume has issues that Disk Utility cannot fix.
What can I do?…
…. For Mac OS X 10.4.6 or earlier: If you have Adobe Photoshop CS2 or Adobe Illustrator CS2 installed, try removing the following files:
* /Applications/Adobe Photoshop CS2/Legal.localized/Tie??ng Vie??t.html
* /Applications/Adobe Illustrator CS2/Legal.localized/Tie??ng Vie??t.html ...
Basically this error means you’re probably doomed and should have good backups. Note, however, the curious Adobe related bug. I bet that one’s quite interesting.
Nasty OS X design flaw: Spotlight and sleep
Mac OS X: Why your Mac might not sleep or stay in sleep mode: "SpotlightWow. That's one heck of a design flaw -- more than a mere bug. This may explain all those dead laptop drives from owners who closed their new MacBook, stuck it their bag, and expected it to sleep. If Spotlight was at work in the background, the machine won't sleep.
... Your computer will not sleep if Spotlight is indexing content, because that requires hard disk access. For example, if you just installed or reinstalled Mac OS X, Spotlight may need a while to index content...
Dumb.
An exceptional list of Windows developer tools and resources
It’s from a Windows developer (.NET), but a very useful list for those of us who must occasionally dwell in XP.
Scott Hanselman's Computer Zen - Scott Hanselman's 2006 Ultimate Developer and Power Users Tool List for Windows
He likes the Notepad2 or Notepad++ text editors. I still use TextPad myself — but that’s probably from inertia.
Thursday, August 31, 2006
Dans Data on affordable NAS solutions
Inching toward the NAS of our dreamsAlas, it's PC only.
When Netgear's SC101 Storage Central box first came out, I was hopeful. It accepts one or two PATA drives, does not come with them pre-installed, can run them as individuals or in mirrored mode, even allows volume spanning across multiple units, has easy setup, and, as I write this, it costs less than $AU200 delivered (rather less, in the States).
But then I cursed Netgear unto the seventh generation, for lo, the box did not spin down its drives.
But then, behold, there came BIOS updates, and one of them added spindown. Glory be.
Drive spindown and lifespan
The USB drive time bombI destroyed an iBook drive by basically using it like a server drive for 3 years. No hard feelings, I flogged that beastie.
...In a typical business-computer situation, where the skinflints in the purchasing department have made sure that every PC in the place is short of physical memory and so flogs its drive non-stop for eight hours a day, a substantial fraction of those drives can be expected to last two years or less. Three is definitely pushing it. Support people in such companies are used to doing drive replacements, and would probably have to do significantly fewer if the computers had more RAM.
People with the misfortune to have bought a base-spec Dell desktop are in the same situation, but so are a lot of geeks, who make up for their ample system RAM by spending a lot more time in front of the computer doing stuff that hits the disk. Heck, just downloading all that video will stop the disk receiving it from ever spinning down.
The way you make consumer drives last is by not using them. If they're spun down in standby mode, they're not wearing out. Even if a drive's kept in an anti-static bag in a cupboard, it won't last forever, but it's usually the physical components like the spindle and head assembly bearings that kill a drive after two years. When they ain't movin', they ain't wearin'.
Getting hard drives to spin down on any modern computer is, of course, easy. You can set the spin-down time to a really aggressive laptop-on-batteries five minutes or so, if you like. Consumer drives spin up fast (server drives don't), so there's no huge performance penalty to pay for doing that.
But if you're using USB drive boxes, their own little bridge interface is what decides when the drive spins down. Or, more accurately, if the drive spins down....
I haven't paid enough attention to spin-down in external drive units. Mea Culpa. Now we all know better ...