Daring Fireball: Some Facts About AACThe .DOC (Word) file format made Microsoft, along with extreme (and illegal) ruthlessness (back in the day) and the ability to break Lotus at will. Even in its current, seemingly senile, state I dread the thought of Microsoft owning a music file format. I even get twitchy at them owning HD Photo despite their standardization claims.
... The rights to MP3 in most countries, including the U.S., are held by Thomson Consumer Electronics, and companies must pay them licensing fees for any hardware or software product that plays or encodes MP3 audio. Audio playback in hardware costs $0.75 per unit, for example; encoding costs $1.25 per unit.
... AAC is not “unique” to Apple. It’s not even controlled or invented by Apple, or any other single company. It is an ISO standard that was invented by engineers at Dolby, working with companies like Fraunhofer, Sony, AT&T, and Nokia. Licensing is controlled by Via. For up to 400,000 units per year, AAC playback costs $1.00 per unit; for more than 400,000 units per year, the price drops to $0.74 per unit.
[jf: DF doesn't say what AAC encoding costs ...]
In terms of licensing costs, patents, and openness, AAC is very much comparable to MP3. MP3 does have the advantage of near-ubiquitous support in consumer electronics and software; AAC has the advantage of slightly better audio quality at the same encoding bitrate. Additionally, MP3 requires a royalty fee of 2 percent for “electronic music distribution”, AAC requires no royalty fee for distribution.
... it is true that WMA licensing is significantly cheaper: $0.10 per unit for playback of two or fewer channels of audio, $0.20 per unit for encoding. But WMA is not an industry standard. Unlike AAC, it is controlled by a single company: Microsoft. And in for a penny, in for a pound: once you license WMA audio, you’re also on the hook to Microsoft for licensing fees for Windows Media DRM (if you need support for DRM) and Windows Media Video.
Tuesday, April 10, 2007
Daring Fireball on AAC, MP3 and WMA licensing
Monday, April 09, 2007
FileMaker 8: dumbest software ever?
Imagine you have a FileMaker database that's configured to login using the guest account.
Now create an admin account and reduce guest privileges to read-only.
Exit.
Now you're locked out of the database. It won't ask for a un/pw because it's configured to login using the guest account. You can't change the settings because you don't have access privileges.
Wow. What a rotten piece of junk.
Fortunately I'm geeky enough to try starting up holding down the option key. As I'd guessed, that forces FM to ask for a un/pw despite the startup setting.
Update: If you change the startup account you do get a warning about login (shift for windows, option for Mac), but you don't get this warning if you reduce privileges for an existing guest account.
Update: Now that I've calmed down, here's what FileMaker could do to fix this:
- Include a menu option in a logical place for requesting a change in privileges/login.
- If the structure of FM is such that this cannot occur without a restart, then FM should provide a dialog saying (in essence) 'Close and restart required, is that ok?'
iSquint: Pod Video Made Easy.
Bringing the ease of AppleTalk to wide area IP
Have your Mac say Bonjour to tout le mondeMy oddball Brother MFC has Bonjour (mDNS) support. I recommend not buying any networkable device that lacks support for mDNS, though it's very hard to learn which devices do this. (Heck, most product descriptions don't even identify which devices have Ethernet ports!)
By now, most Mac users are probably familiar with the magic that is Bonjour (formerly known as Rendezvous). A decade or two ago, when local networks emerged, many computer vendors came up with their own network protocols—AppleTalk in Apple's case. Unlike TCP/IP, AppleTalk works completely automatically: addresses are selected without user intervention or even a DHCP server, and the network makes sure all hosts know about all the network services that are available. Since the demise of the vendor-specific network protocols, Apple has been working hard to add the same level of seamlessness and ease-of-use to today's IP networks. On local networks, this has worked very well for a number of years: you can automatically detect other people running iChat, iTunes, and iPhoto, as well as detect local file, print, and web servers. All of this works by virtue of multicast DNS, where all the systems on a local network listen for mDNS requests and reply if they can answer the request. Unfortunately, this mechanism can't work across the Internet: before long, the only traffic we'd see would be mDNS requests.
It turns out that the Bonjour that we all know and love has a little-known sibling that does work across the Internet: Wide-Area Bonjour. And it's part of Mac OS X Tiger. It works like this. When you get an IP address from your friendly neighborhood DHCP server, the DHCP server usually also supplies a domain name. Wide-Area Bonjour looks up a couple of special DNS names under the supplied domain name. In most cases, these lookups fail and nothing
Sunday, April 08, 2007
Core Image Fun House -- the powerful image editor you didn't know you had
Besides a massive (1.3 GB) library of Apple documentation (take that Spotlight!) the Developer install includes several useful tools and at least one semi-frivolous tool: Core Image Fun House. I tried out the perspective manipulation tool. Very impressive.
You can do some valuable image manipulation with this, especially if you don't own Aperture. You can, for example, apply noise reduction, something that's part of Aperture but not part of iPhoto 6. It opened my Canon RAW images (.CR2) without complaint.
It has an interesting export option called "Fun House Preset". This is a package that contains the original RAW file and an plist style XML file.
You can also export as TIFF or JPG. Interesting and potentially useful. I'll test it as an external editor with iPhoto.
O'Reilly, Safari Books, and AppleScript: so close to a win-win
This is one of those situations that's so achingly close to a win-win for everyone that it pains me. If only someone at O'Reilly could realize how close they are! Here's the problem and the solution.
Matt Neuburg's AppleScript book (not Neuberg!) is an excellent overview of AppleScript. Alas, it is limited, as all such books are, by AppleScript's peculiar nature.
The problem is that AppleScript is primarily useful when it interacts with scriptable Applications; this means that many important commands one may think of as belonging to AppleScript belong to Applications instead [2]. If you working to extend an existing script, and decide to research a command in the excellent book index Matt built himself [1], you'll often be frustrated. The command, you see, belongs to the Application, not to AppleScript.
On the other hand, there's a good chance Matt used in the command in one or more examples. In the absence of a companion book entitled "AppleScript for Applications" [3] you'd like to find those examples. Alas, that's where you want a full text search engine.
The good news is, there are two. The even better news is that O'Reilly could make their engine much more visible and useful, with advantages for everyone.
Consider the case of the 'Duplicate' command, which is supported by iTunes (among others) and the Finder (in slightly different ways, no doubt). When I tried Amazon's "search within the book" I discovered several illuminating references. Similarly, O'Reilly allows one to search within the book as a promotion for its Safari eBook library: O'Reilly - Safari Books Online - 0596102119 - AppleScript: The Definitive Guide, 2nd Edition.
The Safari search works well, but they don't want to give away too much for free. You can only read a snippet of information in the search results. A snippet that doesn't, currently, include the page or section number. If you click further you get to the 'buy safari' screen, but you also get to see the section number. Now, you can return to the book and read the information.
Matt would love for O'Reilly to open up Safari a bit more, but they don't want to. That's ok, O'Reilly could make all of us (and themselves) happy by keeping Safari just as closed as it is today, but merely adding a section reference to the search results they freely expose already.
Here's the win-win for O'Reilly, Matt, book retailers and us:
1. Include the section reference in the initial search results screen.Let us count the wins:
2. Promote the search facility in every published O'Reilly book and explain how to use it on the O'Reilly book page.
3. If need be, request readers register to obtain this service. O'Reilly doesn't do spam, but they can suggest email subscriptions, RSS feeds, etc during the registration process.
1. Matt's book is suddenly a better book. Readers get more value from it. They use it more. They like it and O'Reilly more.It's a win-win for everyone. I just hope someone at O'Reilly can see the profit in it for them.
2. O'Reilly gets ongoing visits from its customers. Many would kill for this alone.
3. O'Reilly gets free, regular, promotion of Safari services.
4. O'Reilly sells more books, Amazon sells more books.
5. O'Reilly does not reduce the value of Safari, they enhance it by introducing users to it without giving it away.
john
[1] In my real life I'm a knowledge representation/informatics geek. I have a lot of respect for the unrecognized intellectual labor that goes into producing a truly excellent index. In this case Matt did the work himself!
[2] Many applications may use the same string to refer to somewhat similar functions with slightly different syntax and semantics. This "ontologic dilemma" is a kind of uncontrolled overloading, and it makes AppleScript very challenging to use.
[3] If Matt decides to sell an "AppleScript for Applications" as a Tidbits eBook I'll pay for mine in advance.
Saturday, April 07, 2007
The NYT reviews travel bargain finder services
Sifting Data to Uncover Travel Deals - New York Times... The Internet abounds with offers for low fares. You can find them on the major Internet travel agent sites like Orbitz, Travelocity or on more specialized sites like Cheaptickets.com or Sidestep.com.
Farecast.com, which gathered a following with technology that enables it to predict the direction of airfares on a particular route, is back with another innovation that it says can distinguish the best deals in air travel....
...George Hobica, a former travel writer, says he thinks that fare-finder sites that rely only on data feeds miss bargains mainly because they do not include the information from Southwest Airlines. Southwest offers bargain fares but does not share its information with other Web sites. He started airfare based on the idea that “technology can fail.
...For the hard-core traveler, the kind who wants to make sure he has the highest odds of making that meeting in Manhattan, there is Flightstats.com. It compiles statistics not just by airline, but by each flight. So, for instance, if you wanted to see which flights between Atlanta and Newark are most prone to problems, you would go to its Flight Rating section and find that while Continental Flight 1154 is on time 96 percent of the time, Continental Flight 1156 is on time only 44 percent of the time and was canceled or diverted 6 percent of the time over the last 60 days.The site also helpfully lays out vital bits of information you need to make a decision. For instance, it cites the number of flights on a particular route. The on-time statistics become more relevant if you know only two flights were made on a particular route, not 54.
... One source of data at FlightStats on frequent-flier promotions comes from Boaz Shmueli, who runs MileMaven.com and PointMaven. If your goal in life is to accumulate enough points to get free flights to Hawaii for the family vacation, you will want to frequent these sites...... Google Mobile’s (www.google.com/intl/en-us/mobile/sms/) text messaging service for cellphones provides information in a pinch. You can get flight arrival or departure information (it comes from Flightstats) by typing in the flight number, like “Jetblue 91” on your phone’s SMS service and sending the query to 466453. (That is Google on the keypad, in case you want to remember it.)
You can also get the phone number of an airline, which can come in handy when you have just learned a flight has been canceled. (While other frustrated travelers shove each other in line at the counter, you make a few calls.) Google also offers to translate words into foreign languages and provides driving directions.
Orbitz also makes flight information available to cellphone users. Type in orbitz.com from any Web-enabled phone and you can also get information about hotels that are near the airport in 20 major cities. It details room availability and prices.
Nextag.com, the comparison shopping site, scours other Web sites for deals on electronics, clothing and other products. Now it searches Web sites like Orbitz, hotels.com and cheaptickets.com to compile a list of hotels. It makes a similar effort for car rentals...