Option Airport: find strongest

Again, the option key.

TidBITS: Find Strongest Wi-Fi Networks Easily: "If you hold down the Option key when dropping the AirPort status menu, it lists available networks in order of signal strength, rather than the usual (and useless) alphabetical sort.

Daring Fireball on AAC, MP3 and WMA licensing

DF has the first public comparison of MP3, AAC and WMA licensing fees I've seen. Emphases mine.

Daring Fireball: Some Facts About AAC

... The rights to MP3 in most countries, including the U.S., are held by Thomson Consumer Electronics, and companies must pay them licensing fees for any hardware or software product that plays or encodes MP3 audio. Audio playback in hardware costs $0.75 per unit, for example; encoding costs $1.25 per unit.

... AAC is not “unique” to Apple. It’s not even controlled or invented by Apple, or any other single company. It is an ISO standard that was invented by engineers at Dolby, working with companies like Fraunhofer, Sony, AT&T, and Nokia. Licensing is controlled by Via. For up to 400,000 units per year, AAC playback costs $1.00 per unit; for more than 400,000 units per year, the price drops to $0.74 per unit.

[jf: DF doesn't say what AAC encoding costs ...]

In terms of licensing costs, patents, and openness, AAC is very much comparable to MP3. MP3 does have the advantage of near-ubiquitous support in consumer electronics and software; AAC has the advantage of slightly better audio quality at the same encoding bitrate. Additionally, MP3 requires a royalty fee of 2 percent for “electronic music distribution”, AAC requires no royalty fee for distribution.

... it is true that WMA licensing is significantly cheaper: $0.10 per unit for playback of two or fewer channels of audio, $0.20 per unit for encoding. But WMA is not an industry standard. Unlike AAC, it is controlled by a single company: Microsoft. And in for a penny, in for a pound: once you license WMA audio, you’re also on the hook to Microsoft for licensing fees for Windows Media DRM (if you need support for DRM) and Windows Media Video.

The .DOC (Word) file format made Microsoft, along with extreme (and illegal) ruthlessness (back in the day) and the ability to break Lotus at will. Even in its current, seemingly senile, state I dread the thought of Microsoft owning a music file format. I even get twitchy at them owning HD Photo despite their standardization claims.

FileMaker 8: dumbest software ever?

This is rich.

Imagine you have a FileMaker database that's configured to login using the guest account.

Now create an admin account and reduce guest privileges to read-only.

Exit.

Now you're locked out of the database. It won't ask for a un/pw because it's configured to login using the guest account. You can't change the settings because you don't have access privileges.

Wow. What a rotten piece of junk.

Fortunately I'm geeky enough to try starting up holding down the option key. As I'd guessed, that forces FM to ask for a un/pw despite the startup setting.

Update: If you change the startup account you do get a warning about login (shift for windows, option for Mac), but you don't get this warning if you reduce privileges for an existing guest account.

Update: Now that I've calmed down, here's what FileMaker could do to fix this:

1. Include a menu option in a logical place for requesting a change in privileges/login.
2. If the structure of FM is such that this cannot occur without a restart, then FM should provide a dialog saying (in essence) 'Close and restart required, is that ok?'
   

iSquint: Pod Video Made Easy.

I missed this one: iSquint. I've been using another app to burn DVDs to the iPod, I'll have to try this one. There's a commercial version for the whimsical price of $23.32.

Bringing the ease of AppleTalk to wide area IP

Nice review by ars technica ...

Have your Mac say Bonjour to tout le monde

By now, most Mac users are probably familiar with the magic that is Bonjour (formerly known as Rendezvous). A decade or two ago, when local networks emerged, many computer vendors came up with their own network protocols—AppleTalk in Apple's case. Unlike TCP/IP, AppleTalk works completely automatically: addresses are selected without user intervention or even a DHCP server, and the network makes sure all hosts know about all the network services that are available. Since the demise of the vendor-specific network protocols, Apple has been working hard to add the same level of seamlessness and ease-of-use to today's IP networks. On local networks, this has worked very well for a number of years: you can automatically detect other people running iChat, iTunes, and iPhoto, as well as detect local file, print, and web servers. All of this works by virtue of multicast DNS, where all the systems on a local network listen for mDNS requests and reply if they can answer the request. Unfortunately, this mechanism can't work across the Internet: before long, the only traffic we'd see would be mDNS requests.

It turns out that the Bonjour that we all know and love has a little-known sibling that does work across the Internet: Wide-Area Bonjour. And it's part of Mac OS X Tiger. It works like this. When you get an IP address from your friendly neighborhood DHCP server, the DHCP server usually also supplies a domain name. Wide-Area Bonjour looks up a couple of special DNS names under the supplied domain name. In most cases, these lookups fail and nothing

My oddball Brother MFC has Bonjour (mDNS) support. I recommend not buying any networkable device that lacks support for mDNS, though it's very hard to learn which devices do this. (Heck, most product descriptions don't even identify which devices have Ethernet ports!)

Core Image Fun House -- the powerful image editor you didn't know you had

Every modern Mac ships with Apple's developer toolkit, though it's not installed. It's on the DVD. You can also register as a developer (free) and download the latest version (which is what I did today since I'm messing with AppleScript Studio).

Besides a massive (1.3 GB) library of Apple documentation (take that Spotlight!) the Developer install includes several useful tools and at least one semi-frivolous tool: Core Image Fun House. I tried out the perspective manipulation tool. Very impressive.

You can do some valuable image manipulation with this, especially if you don't own Aperture. You can, for example, apply noise reduction, something that's part of Aperture but not part of iPhoto 6. It opened my Canon RAW images (.CR2) without complaint.

It has an interesting export option called "Fun House Preset". This is a package that contains the original RAW file and an plist style XML file.

You can also export as TIFF or JPG. Interesting and potentially useful. I'll test it as an external editor with iPhoto.

O'Reilly, Safari Books, and AppleScript: so close to a win-win

[Updated with a correction per Matt Neuburg's comments. Thank you very much Matt!]

This is one of those situations that's so achingly close to a win-win for everyone that it pains me. If only someone at O'Reilly could realize how close they are! Here's the problem and the solution.

Matt Neuburg's AppleScript book (not Neuberg!) is an excellent overview of AppleScript. Alas, it is limited, as all such books are, by AppleScript's peculiar nature.

The problem is that AppleScript is primarily useful when it interacts with scriptable Applications; this means that many important commands one may think of as belonging to AppleScript belong to Applications instead [2]. If you working to extend an existing script, and decide to research a command in the excellent book index Matt built himself [1], you'll often be frustrated. The command, you see, belongs to the Application, not to AppleScript.

On the other hand, there's a good chance Matt used in the command in one or more examples. In the absence of a companion book entitled "AppleScript for Applications" [3] you'd like to find those examples. Alas, that's where you want a full text search engine.

The good news is, there are two. The even better news is that O'Reilly could make their engine much more visible and useful, with advantages for everyone.

Consider the case of the 'Duplicate' command, which is supported by iTunes (among others) and the Finder (in slightly different ways, no doubt). When I tried Amazon's "search within the book" I discovered several illuminating references. Similarly, O'Reilly allows one to search within the book as a promotion for its Safari eBook library: O'Reilly - Safari Books Online - 0596102119 - AppleScript: The Definitive Guide, 2nd Edition.

The Safari search works well, but they don't want to give away too much for free. You can only read a snippet of information in the search results. A snippet that doesn't, currently, include the page or section number. If you click further you get to the 'buy safari' screen, but you also get to see the section number. Now, you can return to the book and read the information.

Matt would love for O'Reilly to open up Safari a bit more, but they don't want to. That's ok, O'Reilly could make all of us (and themselves) happy by keeping Safari just as closed as it is today, but merely adding a section reference to the search results they freely expose already.

Here's the win-win for O'Reilly, Matt, book retailers and us:

1. Include the section reference in the initial search results screen.
2. Promote the search facility in every published O'Reilly book and explain how to use it on the O'Reilly book page.
3. If need be, request readers register to obtain this service. O'Reilly doesn't do spam, but they can suggest email subscriptions, RSS feeds, etc during the registration process.

Let us count the wins:

1. Matt's book is suddenly a better book. Readers get more value from it. They use it more. They like it and O'Reilly more.
2. O'Reilly gets ongoing visits from its customers. Many would kill for this alone.
3. O'Reilly gets free, regular, promotion of Safari services.
4. O'Reilly sells more books, Amazon sells more books.
5. O'Reilly does not reduce the value of Safari, they enhance it by introducing users to it without giving it away.

It's a win-win for everyone. I just hope someone at O'Reilly can see the profit in it for them.

john

[1] In my real life I'm a knowledge representation/informatics geek. I have a lot of respect for the unrecognized intellectual labor that goes into producing a truly excellent index. In this case Matt did the work himself!

[2] Many applications may use the same string to refer to somewhat similar functions with slightly different syntax and semantics. This "ontologic dilemma" is a kind of uncontrolled overloading, and it makes AppleScript very challenging to use.

[3] If Matt decides to sell an "AppleScript for Applications" as a Tidbits eBook I'll pay for mine in advance.