Monday, December 03, 2007
New Canon CanoScan drivers
Mac OS X 10.5: Canon CanoScan scanners unable to scan tells us Canon has updated CanoScan drivers out. I didn't check this out as my mother won't be on 10.5 for a while, but she does have a CanoScan. Canon's OS X drivers have been quite horrid, so anyone stuck with a Canon scanner might want to take a look at this.
Sunday, December 02, 2007
OS X Backup doesn't do other users folders
I don't recall anyone every mentioning this:
I wonder how many people think they're backing up the family's files, when they're only backing up their own ....
Kind of worthless on a multi-user machine.
.Mac: Backup intended for backing up files in your Home folder, but not your entire startup diskBackup works with .Mac. In some ways it's the precursor to Time Machine.
...Files in other user's Home folders Because Backup runs with the same file permissions as the currently logged-in user, you can't use it for backup up files in other user account's Home folders even if they are on the same computer. Log in as the other user before using Backup.
I wonder how many people think they're backing up the family's files, when they're only backing up their own ....
Kind of worthless on a multi-user machine.
Saturday, December 01, 2007
iPhone 2.0 in summer 2008
Ouch.
I suppose if they're waiting until summer 2008 it might be a 3G phone.
EETimes.com - IPhone delays to impact NAND in '08I'd at least like one with 16GB.
...'Although Samsung expects NAND fundamentals to hold and improve into CY08, our recent checks suggest that, due to a pushout in the introduction of such 'killer applications' as the second-generation iPhone from the March/April time frame to mid to late summer, demand for NAND in 1H08 could weaken more than expected,'' said Mehdi Hosseini, an analyst with Friedman Billings Ramsey & Co. Inc. (FBR), in a report. Indeed, after recently rolling out the iPhone, Apple is projected to show new and less expensive products in 2008. Apple is also working on new iPods, which, in turn, could drive the NAND market in 2008...
I suppose if they're waiting until summer 2008 it might be a 3G phone.
Email for our 5 year old
Our boys have never had much interest in email, and given the declining use of email by the non-employed it's unlikely they'll ever do much with it.
Our five year old daughter, however, has correspondents. That's not too surprising, our children fit classic gender assumptions remarkably well.
So now she's pinkbunnylover67@hotmail.com.
Cough.
The actual setup is a bit more complex and even more controlled than what I'll outline here, but that's for historical reasons. I'll describe the basic setup first.
The components
The implementation
Our five year old daughter, however, has correspondents. That's not too surprising, our children fit classic gender assumptions remarkably well.
So now she's pinkbunnylover67@hotmail.com.
Cough.
The actual setup is a bit more complex and even more controlled than what I'll outline here, but that's for historical reasons. I'll describe the basic setup first.
The components
- We have a family domain and a set of companion Google Apps services. I have complete administrative control over that domain.
- I created a non-admin account for her on the family iMac, which will move downstairs where we can easily watch the children using it. On that account I disabled OS X Chat and set up some lightweight family controls (more when I install OS X 10.5.3 next March).
- OS X Mail using IMAP to Google App Gmail.
The implementation
- The Google Apps account is "invisible" and unknown to our daughter. She doesn't know the password or even that it exists. All mail is sent and received throught that account, and all incoming mail is copied to my wife's account. (I could also send a copy to a bloglines email/rss conduit; if I did that then I'd monitor via bloglines.)
- OS X Mail.app in her account works with Google App Gmail. So I have access to all sent and received email.
Thursday, November 29, 2007
Leopard is officially troubled
Leopard is the New Vista, and It's Pissing Me Off is a rant about Leopard -- from PC Magazine. Not from Dvorak.
I read it, and it seems pretty plausible. It matches up with what I hear from friends who've updated.
I, of course, have said for some time that I wouldn't consider Leopard before 10.5.3.
Now I'm thinking 10.5.4.
Apple should have slipped Leopard a solid year, instead of seven months. Beyond the general bugginess I hear off, there's no doubt they made some arrogant, arbitrary and just-plain-dumb UI changes.
The current recommendation has to be:
I read it, and it seems pretty plausible. It matches up with what I hear from friends who've updated.
I, of course, have said for some time that I wouldn't consider Leopard before 10.5.3.
Now I'm thinking 10.5.4.
Apple should have slipped Leopard a solid year, instead of seven months. Beyond the general bugginess I hear off, there's no doubt they made some arrogant, arbitrary and just-plain-dumb UI changes.
The current recommendation has to be:
- Do not install 10.5 on a Tiger machine. Just don't. If you'd like, wait until I do it and say it's safe to proceed. I am very good at finding bad stuff.
- If you can, put off buying new Apple hardware until 10.5.3.
- If you must buy a machine now, don't migrate any apps or settings from old machines. Just move data. Backup rigorously. Install applications carefully and check that they're all Leopard safe.
- Refrain from making rude remarks about Vista.
Google desktop for OS X - without search
Google Desktop Search is an idea that didn't work.
It's inferior to Windows Desktop Search on XP, it's irrelevant on Vista, and OS X has Spotlight.
It's obsolete.
So the good news is that OS X Google Desktop installation now allows one to omit the search component:
So the main news is that Google may be grudgingly accepting that desktop search is not their cup of tea.
It's inferior to Windows Desktop Search on XP, it's irrelevant on Vista, and OS X has Spotlight.
It's obsolete.
So the good news is that OS X Google Desktop installation now allows one to omit the search component:
Don't want Google search but still want Gadgets? No problem - The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW)Interesting, but I've never found a widget that was really useful -- Apple's have been pretty disappointing. Worse, Google's directory for widgets is a complete mess. They mix up their own high quality widgets with commercial products and pure junk.
...Guess what? As noted in this comment, a subtle 'Choose your own features' link on Google's download page lets you split up the two functions of GD, and just install the Gadget manager without the desktop search component....
So the main news is that Google may be grudgingly accepting that desktop search is not their cup of tea.
Wednesday, November 28, 2007
The ONE blogger feature I'd really like to see
Dear Google:
Until Ecto works better, or until someone ports Windows Live Writer to OS X, I rely on the Google Toolbar "Send to Blogger" feature.
Unfortunately, the "Send to Blogger" feature lacks editing tools (bullets, images) and, most importantly, has no support for Label (tag) lookup.
If I post as Draft, however, I have to:
Please add a new link to the page that appears after I submit a draft. This link would do this:
Thank you.
john
Until Ecto works better, or until someone ports Windows Live Writer to OS X, I rely on the Google Toolbar "Send to Blogger" feature.
Unfortunately, the "Send to Blogger" feature lacks editing tools (bullets, images) and, most importantly, has no support for Label (tag) lookup.
If I post as Draft, however, I have to:
- Right click 'edit posts' and select new window so I get the post listing with proper chrome.
- Find my draft post.
- Click on edit.
Please add a new link to the page that appears after I submit a draft. This link would do this:
- Edit this post (new window)
Thank you.
john
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)